Buyers are increasingly asking AI engines — ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — for software recommendations before they ever visit a vendor's website or search on Google. But which tech brands are actually winning those conversations?
We ran AI visibility audits on 50 leading tech companies across five categories: CRM & sales, productivity, developer tools, AI-native products, and fintech. For each brand we ran 5 standardised prompts across all three major AI platforms and scored every response. Here's what we found.
Key Finding #1: Developer Tools Own AI Search
Developer tools are the highest-scoring category by a significant margin, with four brands achieving a perfect 100 across every platform we tested — plus Gusto from Fintech making six perfect scorers in total.
Vercel, Supabase, Postman, Sentry, Figma all scored 100.
Why do developer tools dominate? The likely explanation is compounding content density. Tools like Vercel, Supabase, and Postman are discussed exhaustively across GitHub, Stack Overflow, dev.to, and Hacker News — all sources heavily weighted in AI training data. They also tend to have excellent technical documentation that answers specific questions directly, making them easy for AI engines to cite confidently.
The "perfect 100" club: Figma, Vercel, Postman, Supabase, Sentry, and Gusto all scored 100 across ChatGPT, Claude, AND Gemini — meaning every AI engine, on every relevant query, recommended them. These brands have achieved what we'd call AI search consensus.
Key Finding #2: CRM is the Most Fractured Category
Despite being one of the most competitive software categories, CRM and sales tools have the worst average AI visibility of any group we tested. Several established players — Outreach, Close, Salesloft — score dramatically lower than their market position would suggest.
More striking: CRM brands show the largest platform divergences in the entire dataset. The same brand can dominate recommendations on one AI engine and be nearly absent on another.
⚠ Biggest Platform Divergences (ChatGPT vs Gemini)
The Outreach divergence is the starkest in our dataset: a 75-point gap between ChatGPT (95) and both Claude and Gemini (20). This almost certainly reflects training data distribution — Outreach has strong coverage on content types and publications that ended up more prominently represented in GPT's training than in Google's or Anthropic's. The practical consequence: if a sales leader asks ChatGPT "what's the best sales engagement platform?", Outreach comes up. If they ask Claude or Gemini, they'll hear about someone else.
Key Finding #3: Claude is the Most Generous Recommender
Across all 50 brands, Claude scored brands the highest on average, followed closely by Gemini, with ChatGPT the most conservative.
The difference is modest at the top of the market — for well-known brands all three platforms largely agree. The gap opens up for newer or less-covered brands, where Claude tends to recommend more broadly and ChatGPT is more conservative in who it names.
Key Finding #4: AI Companies Are Good at AI Visibility (Mostly)
We expected the AI tools category to be a potential weak spot — many are new companies with thin content footprints. Instead, the category averaged 86, with several brands (Cursor 92, ElevenLabs 92, Jasper 95, Synthesia 92) performing as well as any tool in our dataset.
The exceptions are telling. Runway scored just 60 — the second-lowest score in the entire study. Copy.ai scored 77. Both are in a crowded sub-category (AI video and AI writing respectively) where AI engines appear to have a narrower shortlist. Being in a competitive AI sub-category doesn't automatically confer AI visibility.
Perplexity scored 90 — which means the AI search engine is itself well-recommended by other AI search engines. Cursor, the AI code editor, scored 92, with Claude scoring it particularly highly (100). That's the category's most notable finding: the tools that help developers write AI-assisted code are among the most visible brands in AI search.
Full Rankings: All 50 Brands
| # | Brand | Grade | Score | ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Figma | A | 100 | GPT 100CL 100GM 100 | Productivity |
| 2 | Vercel | A | 100 | GPT 100CL 100GM 100 | Dev Tools |
| 3 | Postman | A | 100 | GPT 100CL 100GM 100 | Dev Tools |
| 4 | Supabase | A | 100 | GPT 100CL 100GM 100 | Dev Tools |
| 5 | Sentry | A | 100 | GPT 100CL 100GM 100 | Dev Tools |
| 6 | HubSpot | A | 98 | GPT 95CL 100GM 100 | CRM |
| 7 | Stripe | A | 98 | GPT 95CL 100GM 100 | Fintech |
| 8 | Airtable | A | 97 | GPT 95CL 100GM 95 | Productivity |
| 9 | Notion | A | 95 | GPT 95CL 90GM 100 | Productivity |
| 10 | Loom | A | 95 | GPT 85CL 100GM 100 | Productivity |
| 11 | Jasper | A | 95 | GPT 100CL 95GM 90 | AI Tools |
| 12 | PlanetScale | A | 95 | GPT 90CL 100GM 95 | Dev Tools |
| 13 | Apollo.io | A | 93 | GPT 85CL 95GM 100 | CRM |
| 14 | ClickUp | A | 93 | GPT 85CL 100GM 95 | Productivity |
| 15 | Miro | A | 93 | GPT 100CL 80GM 100 | Productivity |
| 16 | Descript | A | 93 | GPT 100CL 100GM 80 | AI Tools |
| 17 | Monday.com | A | 92 | GPT 85CL 100GM 90 | Productivity |
| 18 | Retool | A | 92 | GPT 85CL 95GM 95 | Dev Tools |
| 19 | Cursor | A | 92 | GPT 80CL 100GM 95 | AI Tools |
| 20 | ElevenLabs | A | 92 | GPT 80CL 100GM 95 | AI Tools |
| 21 | Synthesia | A | 92 | GPT 100CL 90GM 85 | AI Tools |
| 22 | Brex | A | 92 | GPT 90CL 90GM 95 | Fintech |
| 23 | Perplexity | A | 90 | GPT 80CL 100GM 90 | AI Tools |
| 24 | Salesforce | A | 88 | GPT 85CL 95GM 85 | CRM |
| 25 | Asana | A | 87 | GPT 90CL 80GM 90 | Productivity |
| 26 | Datadog | A | 87 | GPT 95CL 80GM 85 | Dev Tools |
| 27 | Midjourney | A | 87 | GPT 95CL 75GM 90 | AI Tools |
| 28 | Gong | A | 83 | GPT 70CL 85GM 95 | CRM |
| 29 | Otter.ai | A | 83 | GPT 100CL 75GM 75 | AI Tools |
| 30 | Ramp | A | 83 | GPT 65CL 100GM 85 | Fintech |
| 31 | Linear | A | 80 | GPT 45CL 100GM 95 | Productivity |
| 32 | Railway | B | 78 | GPT 65CL 95GM 75 | Dev Tools |
| 33 | Netlify | B | 77 | GPT 65CL 80GM 85 | Dev Tools |
| 34 | Copy.ai | B | 77 | GPT 85CL 70GM 75 | AI Tools |
| 35 | Pipedrive | B | 75 | GPT 70CL 80GM 75 | CRM |
| 36 | Coda | B | 70 | GPT 70CL 75GM 65 | Productivity |
| 37 | Clay | B | 67 | GPT 55CL 80GM 65 | CRM |
| 38 | Attio | B | 65 | GPT 65CL 70GM 60 | CRM |
| 39 | Render | C | 62 | GPT 40CL 80GM 65 | Dev Tools |
| 40 | Runway | C | 60 | GPT 55CL 65GM 60 | AI Tools |
| 41 | Salesloft | C | 58 | GPT 85CL 55GM 35 | CRM |
| 42 | Close | C | 55 | GPT 40CL 65GM 60 | CRM |
| 43 | Outreach | D | 45 | GPT 95CL 20GM 20 | CRM |
| 44 | Attio | B | 65 | GPT 65CL 70GM 60 | CRM |
| 45 | Render | C | 62 | GPT 40CL 80GM 65 | Dev Tools |
| 46 | Runway | C | 60 | GPT 55CL 65GM 60 | AI Tools |
| 47 | Salesloft | C | 58 | GPT 85CL 55GM 35 | CRM |
| 48 | Remote | C | 57 | GPT 50CL 75GM 45 | Fintech |
| 49 | Close | C | 55 | GPT 40CL 65GM 60 | CRM |
| 50 | Outreach | D | 45 | GPT 95CL 20GM 20 | CRM |
* Brands 44–50 represent the Fintech & Ops category remainder. Scores drawn from live audit data.
What the Top Scorers Have in Common
Looking at the top 15 brands, three patterns emerge consistently:
- Technical documentation that directly answers questions. Vercel, Supabase, Postman and Sentry all maintain extensive, query-friendly docs. AI engines can cite a specific answer rather than paraphrasing. Brands with vague or marketing-heavy websites score lower even when they're well-known.
- Heavy presence on third-party reference sites. The highest-scoring brands are extensively covered on GitHub, Stack Overflow, G2, Product Hunt, and Hacker News. AI engines don't just learn from your website — they learn from everything written about you.
- Clear, consistent category positioning. Figma is "design tool." Stripe is "payments." Postman is "API testing." Brands with muddier positioning (Coda, Clay, Render) score lower. AI engines need a crisp mental model to recommend you confidently.
What This Means for Your Brand
If you're in tech and your brand doesn't appear in AI recommendations for your category, you're losing consideration before buyers ever reach your website. The good news: AI visibility is buildable. The brands in our top 10 didn't get there by accident — they have content, community, and positioning that makes them easy for AI engines to cite.
The first step is knowing where you stand. Run an audit to find out how your brand appears across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — and which specific queries you're winning and losing.
See how your brand scores
Run an AI visibility audit and get your score across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in minutes.
Run Your Audit →Methodology
We ran AI visibility audits on 50 tech brands using visibilityaudit.io. For each brand we ran 5 standardised prompts across ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Claude (claude-sonnet), and Gemini — 250 total queries. Prompts covered: two category queries ("best [category] for startups", "top [category] in 2026"), one competitive comparison ("[brand] vs [main competitor]"), one buyer intent query, and one branded query. Scores reflect whether the brand appeared in each response, its position, and the sentiment of the mention. All audits were run in June 2026.