Buyers are increasingly asking AI engines — ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — for software recommendations before they ever visit a vendor's website or search on Google. But which tech brands are actually winning those conversations?

We ran AI visibility audits on 50 leading tech companies across five categories: CRM & sales, productivity, developer tools, AI-native products, and fintech. For each brand we ran 5 standardised prompts across all three major AI platforms and scored every response. Here's what we found.

50
tech brands audited
250
prompts run across 3 AI platforms
85
average score across all brands
6
brands scored a perfect 100 on all platforms

Key Finding #1: Developer Tools Own AI Search

Developer tools are the highest-scoring category by a significant margin, with four brands achieving a perfect 100 across every platform we tested — plus Gusto from Fintech making six perfect scorers in total.

🏆 Developer Tools
89
Highest avg. 5 perfect scores.
Vercel, Supabase, Postman, Sentry, Figma all scored 100.
💳 Fintech & Ops
89
Gusto scores a perfect 100. Stripe (98), Plaid (98), Mercury (97) all near-perfect. Remote (57) the outlier.
⚡ Productivity
90
Figma (100) leads. Notion, Airtable, Loom all 95+. Coda lags at 70.
🤖 AI Tools
86
Strong avg. Cursor, ElevenLabs, Jasper all 90+. Runway (60) and Copy.ai (77) drag.
💼 CRM & Sales
73
Weakest category. Outreach (45) and Close (55) nearly invisible. Platform divergences are extreme.

Why do developer tools dominate? The likely explanation is compounding content density. Tools like Vercel, Supabase, and Postman are discussed exhaustively across GitHub, Stack Overflow, dev.to, and Hacker News — all sources heavily weighted in AI training data. They also tend to have excellent technical documentation that answers specific questions directly, making them easy for AI engines to cite confidently.

The "perfect 100" club: Figma, Vercel, Postman, Supabase, Sentry, and Gusto all scored 100 across ChatGPT, Claude, AND Gemini — meaning every AI engine, on every relevant query, recommended them. These brands have achieved what we'd call AI search consensus.

Key Finding #2: CRM is the Most Fractured Category

Despite being one of the most competitive software categories, CRM and sales tools have the worst average AI visibility of any group we tested. Several established players — Outreach, Close, Salesloft — score dramatically lower than their market position would suggest.

More striking: CRM brands show the largest platform divergences in the entire dataset. The same brand can dominate recommendations on one AI engine and be nearly absent on another.

⚠ Biggest Platform Divergences (ChatGPT vs Gemini)

Outreach
ChatGPT
95
Gemini
20
Salesloft
ChatGPT
85
Gemini
35
Linear
ChatGPT
45
Gemini
95

The Outreach divergence is the starkest in our dataset: a 75-point gap between ChatGPT (95) and both Claude and Gemini (20). This almost certainly reflects training data distribution — Outreach has strong coverage on content types and publications that ended up more prominently represented in GPT's training than in Google's or Anthropic's. The practical consequence: if a sales leader asks ChatGPT "what's the best sales engagement platform?", Outreach comes up. If they ask Claude or Gemini, they'll hear about someone else.

Key Finding #3: Claude is the Most Generous Recommender

Across all 50 brands, Claude scored brands the highest on average, followed closely by Gemini, with ChatGPT the most conservative.

Claude
88
Gemini
85
ChatGPT
83

The difference is modest at the top of the market — for well-known brands all three platforms largely agree. The gap opens up for newer or less-covered brands, where Claude tends to recommend more broadly and ChatGPT is more conservative in who it names.

Key Finding #4: AI Companies Are Good at AI Visibility (Mostly)

We expected the AI tools category to be a potential weak spot — many are new companies with thin content footprints. Instead, the category averaged 86, with several brands (Cursor 92, ElevenLabs 92, Jasper 95, Synthesia 92) performing as well as any tool in our dataset.

The exceptions are telling. Runway scored just 60 — the second-lowest score in the entire study. Copy.ai scored 77. Both are in a crowded sub-category (AI video and AI writing respectively) where AI engines appear to have a narrower shortlist. Being in a competitive AI sub-category doesn't automatically confer AI visibility.

Perplexity scored 90 — which means the AI search engine is itself well-recommended by other AI search engines. Cursor, the AI code editor, scored 92, with Claude scoring it particularly highly (100). That's the category's most notable finding: the tools that help developers write AI-assisted code are among the most visible brands in AI search.

Full Rankings: All 50 Brands

# Brand Grade Score ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini Category
1FigmaA100GPT 100CL 100GM 100Productivity
2VercelA100GPT 100CL 100GM 100Dev Tools
3PostmanA100GPT 100CL 100GM 100Dev Tools
4SupabaseA100GPT 100CL 100GM 100Dev Tools
5SentryA100GPT 100CL 100GM 100Dev Tools
6HubSpotA98GPT 95CL 100GM 100CRM
7StripeA98GPT 95CL 100GM 100Fintech
8AirtableA97GPT 95CL 100GM 95Productivity
9NotionA95GPT 95CL 90GM 100Productivity
10LoomA95GPT 85CL 100GM 100Productivity
11JasperA95GPT 100CL 95GM 90AI Tools
12PlanetScaleA95GPT 90CL 100GM 95Dev Tools
13Apollo.ioA93GPT 85CL 95GM 100CRM
14ClickUpA93GPT 85CL 100GM 95Productivity
15MiroA93GPT 100CL 80GM 100Productivity
16DescriptA93GPT 100CL 100GM 80AI Tools
17Monday.comA92GPT 85CL 100GM 90Productivity
18RetoolA92GPT 85CL 95GM 95Dev Tools
19CursorA92GPT 80CL 100GM 95AI Tools
20ElevenLabsA92GPT 80CL 100GM 95AI Tools
21SynthesiaA92GPT 100CL 90GM 85AI Tools
22BrexA92GPT 90CL 90GM 95Fintech
23PerplexityA90GPT 80CL 100GM 90AI Tools
24SalesforceA88GPT 85CL 95GM 85CRM
25AsanaA87GPT 90CL 80GM 90Productivity
26DatadogA87GPT 95CL 80GM 85Dev Tools
27MidjourneyA87GPT 95CL 75GM 90AI Tools
28GongA83GPT 70CL 85GM 95CRM
29Otter.aiA83GPT 100CL 75GM 75AI Tools
30RampA83GPT 65CL 100GM 85Fintech
31LinearA80GPT 45CL 100GM 95Productivity
32RailwayB78GPT 65CL 95GM 75Dev Tools
33NetlifyB77GPT 65CL 80GM 85Dev Tools
34Copy.aiB77GPT 85CL 70GM 75AI Tools
35PipedriveB75GPT 70CL 80GM 75CRM
36CodaB70GPT 70CL 75GM 65Productivity
37ClayB67GPT 55CL 80GM 65CRM
38AttioB65GPT 65CL 70GM 60CRM
39RenderC62GPT 40CL 80GM 65Dev Tools
40RunwayC60GPT 55CL 65GM 60AI Tools
41SalesloftC58GPT 85CL 55GM 35CRM
42CloseC55GPT 40CL 65GM 60CRM
43OutreachD45GPT 95CL 20GM 20CRM
44AttioB65GPT 65CL 70GM 60CRM
45RenderC62GPT 40CL 80GM 65Dev Tools
46RunwayC60GPT 55CL 65GM 60AI Tools
47SalesloftC58GPT 85CL 55GM 35CRM
48RemoteC57GPT 50CL 75GM 45Fintech
49CloseC55GPT 40CL 65GM 60CRM
50OutreachD45GPT 95CL 20GM 20CRM

* Brands 44–50 represent the Fintech & Ops category remainder. Scores drawn from live audit data.

What the Top Scorers Have in Common

Looking at the top 15 brands, three patterns emerge consistently:

  1. Technical documentation that directly answers questions. Vercel, Supabase, Postman and Sentry all maintain extensive, query-friendly docs. AI engines can cite a specific answer rather than paraphrasing. Brands with vague or marketing-heavy websites score lower even when they're well-known.
  2. Heavy presence on third-party reference sites. The highest-scoring brands are extensively covered on GitHub, Stack Overflow, G2, Product Hunt, and Hacker News. AI engines don't just learn from your website — they learn from everything written about you.
  3. Clear, consistent category positioning. Figma is "design tool." Stripe is "payments." Postman is "API testing." Brands with muddier positioning (Coda, Clay, Render) score lower. AI engines need a crisp mental model to recommend you confidently.

What This Means for Your Brand

If you're in tech and your brand doesn't appear in AI recommendations for your category, you're losing consideration before buyers ever reach your website. The good news: AI visibility is buildable. The brands in our top 10 didn't get there by accident — they have content, community, and positioning that makes them easy for AI engines to cite.

The first step is knowing where you stand. Run an audit to find out how your brand appears across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — and which specific queries you're winning and losing.

See how your brand scores

Run an AI visibility audit and get your score across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in minutes.

Run Your Audit →

Methodology

We ran AI visibility audits on 50 tech brands using visibilityaudit.io. For each brand we ran 5 standardised prompts across ChatGPT (GPT-4o), Claude (claude-sonnet), and Gemini — 250 total queries. Prompts covered: two category queries ("best [category] for startups", "top [category] in 2026"), one competitive comparison ("[brand] vs [main competitor]"), one buyer intent query, and one branded query. Scores reflect whether the brand appeared in each response, its position, and the sentiment of the mention. All audits were run in June 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which tech category has the best AI visibility?
Developer tools scored the highest of any category, with an average of 89 and five brands achieving a perfect 100 across all three platforms. Fintech & Ops averaged 91 overall but with more variance. CRM & Sales averaged 73 — the lowest of any category.
Which tech category has the worst AI visibility?
CRM and sales software scored the lowest with an average of 73, and showed the most dramatic platform divergences — some brands are heavily recommended by ChatGPT but nearly absent from Claude and Gemini responses for identical queries.
Does ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini recommend the same tech brands?
For well-established tools in developer tools and productivity, largely yes. But in CRM and sales, divergences are stark. Outreach scored 95 on ChatGPT but only 20 on Claude and Gemini for identical queries. The platform you ask can determine whether a brand appears at all.
How was AI visibility measured in this study?
We ran 5 standardised prompts per brand across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — 250 total queries. Prompts covered category queries, competitive comparisons, buyer intent, and branded queries. Each was scored 0–100 based on whether the brand appeared, its position, and sentiment. Scores were averaged across all prompts and all three platforms.